“Trump’s policies frustrate farmers—why did so many vote for him?” | (ट्रम्प की नीतियों को ‘किसानों को निराश करना चाहिए’ – इतने सारे लोगों ने उन्हें वोट क्यों दिया? | अमेरिकी चुनाव 2024 )

Main Points In Hindi (मुख्य बातें – हिंदी में)

1. किसानों की निर्भरता: कैलिफोर्निया की सेंट्रल वैली सालाना लाखों अप्रवासी कृषि श्रमिकों के श्रम पर निर्भर करती है, जिनमें से कई गैर-दस्तावेज हैं। राष्ट्रपति डोनाल्ड ट्रंप के निर्वासन के वादे का किसानों के जीवन पर गहरा असर पड़ने की संभावना है।

2. ट्रम्प का समर्थन: कई किसान, जैसे कि टॉम बार्सिलोस, ट्रंप पर भरोसा जताते हैं, यह मानते हुए कि उन्होंने कृषि से जुड़े मुद्दों, जैसे पानी की पहुंच, को समझा है। वे तरजीह देते हैं कि ट्रंप के तहत कृषि के लिए अनुकूल नीतियाँ लागू होती हैं, जो उनके लिए फायदेमंद होती हैं।

3. पर्यावरणीय नियमों का प्रभाव: किसान डेमोक्रेट नेताओं द्वारा पेश किए गए सख्त पर्यावरण और उत्सर्जन नियमों को दोष देते हैं जो उनकी कृषि गतिविधियों में रुकावट डालते हैं, जैसे कि उपकरणों की बढ़ती लागत और मशीनीकरण की आवश्यकता।

4. अप्रवासी श्रमिकों की स्थिति: किसान यह मानते हैं कि प्रस्तावित निर्वासन नीतियों से कृषि कार्यबल में भारी कमी आएगी, जिससे खाद्य उत्पादन और आपूर्ति में आधी कटौती हो सकती है।

5. आर्थिक चुनौतियाँ: ट्रंप के कृषि नीतियों की प्रभाविता पर विवाद है, साथ ही चाइना के साथ व्यापार संघर्ष के परिणामस्वरूप अमेरिकी कृषि को होने वाले संभावित नुकसान को लेकर चिंता जताई गई है। किसानों का मानना है कि उन्हें अधिक आर्थिक सहायता की जरूरत है और उनके सामने बढ़ती लागतों एवं बाजारों की अस्थिरता की समस्याएं हैं।

Main Points In English(मुख्य बातें – अंग्रेज़ी में)

Here are the main points from the provided text:

1. Dependence on Immigrant Labor: The California Central Valley relies heavily on the labor of hundreds of thousands of undocumented immigrant workers for its agricultural production, contributing significantly to the nation’s food supply.

2. Potential Impact of Deportations: President Donald Trump’s promise to deport millions of undocumented immigrants threatens the livelihood of farmers in this region, potentially leading to a decline in agricultural output worth up to $60 billion.

3. Support for Trump Among Farmers: Many farmers, like Tom Barcelos, express confidence in Trump despite concerns about deportations and tariffs. They believe Trump understands their challenges, particularly regarding water access and regulatory burdens imposed by environmental laws.

4. Economic Struggles in Agriculture: Farmers are facing increasing costs and bureaucratic obstacles due to stringent environmental regulations, lower crop prices, and fewer viable farms, with a notable decline in the number of farms in the U.S. between 2017 and 2022.

5. Mixed Feelings about Tariffs and Immigration Policies: While some farmers hope that Trump’s administration might support them through agricultural subsidies despite past tariff wars causing significant losses, there is uncertainty about long-term impacts, especially as the agricultural market shifts away from dependence on Chinese exports. Farmers also call for legal pathways for immigrant workers to ensure a stable workforce.

- Advertisement -

Complete News In Hindi(पूरी खबर – हिंदी में)

Complete News In English(पूरी खबर – अंग्रेज़ी में)

Every year, farmers in California’s Central Valley depend on the labor of hundreds of thousands of immigrant agricultural workers to grow and harvest their crops.

However, for many in this region, which produces a quarter of the country’s food, President-elect Donald Trump’s promise to deport millions of undocumented immigrants could threaten their livelihoods, potentially leading to a $60 billion decrease in national agricultural production.

Not everyone believes that these threats will be carried out. Tom Barcelos, who milks 1,600 Holstein cows on his farm in Tulare County, states, “I don’t think there will be any pressure to chase away anyone willing to work in the fields.”

- Advertisement -

As Trump’s tariffs and deportation threats increase, many Americans are puzzled by why voters in farming-dependent counties continue to support him, often with a three-to-one margin in the upcoming presidential election.

Farmers like Barcelos express their trust in Trump. In his first campaign, Trump met with farmers to discuss their water access concerns, as environmental regulations were restricting their water supply in favor of protecting fish and wildlife.

“He understood our situation with water; he recognized the business environment in agriculture was restricted by regulations,” Barcelos says. “He promised to make reforms.”

In his three years in office, Trump did just that, addressing farmers’ concerns.

As the Biden era comes to a close, farmers like Barcelos feel overwhelmed by stringent environmental and emission regulations imposed by Democratic leaders, coinciding with a downturn in U.S. agriculture.

Drought and low crop prices, combined with China reducing its reliance on American corn and soybeans, have put immense pressure on U.S. farmers. Between 2017 and 2022, the number of U.S. farms declined by 141,000, according to the U.S. Department of Agriculture.

Despite Trump’s threats, farmers view him as a bulwark against a progressive environmental movement that they believe creates problems for agriculture without offering solutions.

Barcelos, a third-generation farmer, notes, “Emission issues have raised the cost of our equipment to ridiculous levels.” He recalls that the same truck he bought five years ago now costs $100,000 more.

Regarding tariffs, many farmers hope Trump will ultimately support them. Although his previous tariff battles cost U.S. agriculture about $27 billion in 2018 and 2019, he later provided $32 billion in direct aid to help farmers cope with the impacts.

However, some believe that Trump’s anticipated tariffs may not have the same effect as before. With China no longer heavily reliant on U.S. corn and soybeans, experts warn that a new trade war could hurt U.S. farmers in the long run.

Others question whether sending checks to farmers for potential income losses is sustainable.

Bill Willey, a farmer from Shelby County, Ohio, mentions that Trump’s tariffs and broad deportation could negatively impact grain markets, domestic food production, and the national debt, especially since he employs a small number of workers from Nicaragua each fall through the H-2A visa program.

“This should distract farmers from these matters,” Willey states.

Despite Kamala Harris visiting California, just 200 miles from her hometown of Oakland, Trump won Tulare County by over 20%.

Willey and other farmers didn’t vote for Trump and cannot understand why many in agriculture would still support him given the risks to farming and food production.

Regardless, the impact of Trump’s presidency is likely to affect millions once he takes office next month.

James O’Neil from the American Business Immigration Coalition warns that if half of the agricultural workforce is undocumented, large-scale deportation could cut American food production and supply by half. Approximately 45% of U.S. agricultural workers are undocumented.

“There needs to be a law that legalizes the hardworking agricultural workers we already rely on—those with no criminal records who have shown their commitment to America and American farmers,” he adds.

Barcelos, who also serves as the president of the Lower Tule River Irrigation District, believes that many Democratic policies are detrimental to agriculture. Instead of helping immigrant workers, he argues that California’s minimum wage for farm workers is pushing the industry toward automation, which workers dislike.

“California is forcing automation while trying to halt equipment usage due to emissions,” he says. “We are controlled by coastal cities. We have no chance to fight back.”



Source link